Episode 41: "The Socially Distanced Supreme Court"

[Cross-posted from trumpcon.law]

By Elizabeth Joh

"What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law" podcast, episode 41: The Supreme Court may not be able to meet in person, but they are still doing business over conference call. This month, they've considered three cases about Donald Trump's finances, and whether they should be released to congressional committees and prosecutors in New York. What does history tell us about these cases which could have major consequences for executive power? Listen here

The Breadth of the Ministerial Exception and Ecclesiastical Deference: A State Supreme Court Case Highlights Questions Left Open by Last Year’s U.S. Supreme Court Hosanna-Tabor RulingCross-posted from Justia's Verdict. In my column today, I analyze an interesting case that a state ...Professor Peter Lee on "The Supreme Assimilation of Patent Law"Professor Peter Lee, a leading scholar of patent law, has a new article that will be published in th...Why the Proponents of California’s Same-Sex Marriage Ban Are Unlikely to Succeed in Getting the California Supreme Court to Enforce Proposition 8Part One in a Two-Part Series on What Should Happen to Same-Sex Marriage in California after Holling...

Roundtable

Recent Posts

Archives

Episode 41: "The Socially Distanced Supreme Court"

Roundtable

Tag cloud

Recent Posts

Archives

Episode 41: "The Socially Distanced Supreme Court"